Cattaraugus County Planning Board
Executive Summary
Study Purpose
On April 14, 1999, the Cattaraugus County Legislature asked the
Cattaraugus County Planning Board to study the impacts that the
mining of aggregates may have on communities in the Route 16 Corridor,
which includes Routes 98 and 417, local roads, and I-86.1
This report clarifies key issues and recommends a long-term action
plan with a vision, and five strategies, for achieving a balanced
growth throughout the corridor.
This vision for balanced growth is being developed by the Cattaraugus
County Planning Board (see Attachment No. 1) in order to provide
countywide goals for comprehensive planning and future land use
development 2: The overriding effort to
achieve economic development, if done without a comprehensive concept
of development and without disciplined land use planning, can destroy
the quality of life and character of a rural community.
On the other hand, without economic development, a community may
suffer the ill effects of unemployment, decline and blight.
A balance is therefore needed. Cattaraugus County is not looking
for decline, nor is it seeking unbridled development that destroys
an established way of life along with the environment. It is seeking
instead a planned and well-balanced growth throughout the County.
This report's proposals are designed to encourage all development
in the Route 16 corridor, not to stop or delay mining activities.
The underlying purpose is:
Educational - to provide relevant information to all stakeholders,
and to encourage a dialogue that seeks to identify areas of common
interest and consensus.
Strategic - to propose specific measures that enable mining
companies, municipalities, and other stakeholders to work together
so that they can solve their own problems in this shared environment,
and so that they all can thrive and prosper in the long term (50
or more years into the future).

A gravel mine in upstate New York
Summary of Findings
State Authority is Established
Aggregates mining is a vital industry in New York State, and the
state has ample authority to regulate and safeguard this industry.
The state, however, lacks effective, full disclosure in the mining
permit application process that would identify for the public record,
the prohibition of mining in municipal comprehensive planning and
zoning.
New York State's process is very complex and offers no conflict
resolution services for resolving disputes over local zoning mining
prohibitions, as a pre-litigation option.
Scientific Knowledge is Required
As growth continues in the 21st Century, ecosystem and sustainable
development concepts will be needed in local plans, state permit
reviews, and reclamation plans. An assessment of cumulative impact
would help local governments, state agencies, and mining companies
solve longer-term problems.
Comprehensive Planning is Needed at Local Levels
Municipalities need comprehensive planning for a long term balancing
of interests, for looking beyond annual budget cycles, and for promoting
economic development.
The County has been assisting local governments in this "balancing"
task by updating its own planning efforts and providing training
and technical assistance. Currently, New York State does not assist
local and county comprehensive planning.
Reclamation Plans are Needed for Future Development
Reclaimed mining sites will be needed for future development,
specially those near or adjacent to Route 16 highway frontage. Mining
companies currently do not coordinate reclamation plans with community
plans, and their plans tend not to allow public access to water,
or link with future plans for water and sewer, trail and fiber optic
systems, or a broader mix of ultimate end uses.
Given current practices, it may be difficult to attract quality
investments in or near reclaimed mining sites. Mining companies
may have difficulties in the future generating new revenues from
land sales and leases for reclaimed mining sites that are located
in the vicinity of highway frontage in the Route 16 corridor.
Disputes can be Counter-Productive
Unresolved, prolonged and complex disputes can be counter-productive
to all parties.
Summary of Action Plan - Five Strategies
This study recommends five, separate strategies for the long term
(i.e., the next 50 or more years), that are designed to create a
problem-solving dialogue.
Strategy Number 1: Require Full Disclosure and Mediation
New York State should re-study the effectiveness of its current
policy, which may be improved by requiring a more effective and
timely, full disclosure early in the mining permit application process
whether local zoning does or does not prohibit mining at a particular
site. The state should study the proposal to allow either party
to request a mediation service during a six-month, temporary suspension
of the application process.
In cases where mediation confirms that mining is prohibited at
a particular site by zoning, NYSDEC should not approve mining permits.
This would save taxpayers money, and not violate anyone's rights
to legal due process (legal options would still exist to challenge
zoning, change zoning, or prove that a municipality misrepresented
its law).
Strategy Number 2: Use and Ecosystem Approach
New York State should offer special educational services for all
stakeholders on ecosystem and sustainable development approaches,
SEQRA, comprehensive planning, cumulative impact, and inter-municipal
agreements.
New York State should add a definition of "cumulative impact"
to its regulations, to be used both under SEQRA and comprehensive
planning statutes and regulations.
Municipalities should use inter-municipal agreements to establish
thresholds and standards on cumulative impact for SEQRA and comprehensive
planning purposes.
Strategy Number 3: Improve Comprehensive Planning
Municipalities should use longer time lines (e.g., a minimum of
20 years), in comprehensive planning in order to reduce uncertainty
for stakeholders.
Each community should be required to establish and/or use thresholds
and standards for cumulative impact assessment purposes in their
comprehensive planning process.
Cattaraugus County should provide technical assistance and guidance
through a countywide vision of the future and an updated county
comprehensive plan.
An inventory of prime gravel deposits should be prepared for planning
purposes.
New York State should encourage county and local comprehensive
planning efforts.
Strategy Number 4: Use Zoning to Protect Reclaimed Mining Sites
In the next 50 or more years, reclaimed mining sites should be
designed for a wider variety of ultimate end uses beyond wetlands,
wildlife and fish habitats, and farmland. This can be accomplished
by designing sites also for uses such as public access to water,
housing, commercial plazas, light manufacturing "parks",
visitor centers, greenways, public parks and trails.
Local governments, with mining companies' participation, should
- identify on zoning maps the best locations for new community
growth, and where mining should be allowed (based on comprehensive
plans and the gravel inventory); and
- clarify local zoning conditions of approval under Special Use
Permits for each mining site, for inclusion into state mining
permits by NYSDEC.
Mining companies should study the potential advantages of using
Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) for reclaimed mining sites, thereby
protecting their own interests.
New York State should amend its statutes and regulations to enable
mining companies and towns to use PUD zoning with reclamation plans,
and provide special benefits.
Mined Land PUD "demonstration projects" should be funded
statewide.
New York State should publish a model development agreement for
mining companies and host municipalities on future re-use options
50 or more years into the future.
Strategy Number 5: Turn Conflicts into Opportunities
Establish a goal for mediation during the application process,
to protect mining access to prime gravel deposits at locations that
are compatible with comprehensive plans.
Include aggregates mining as a part of the comprehensive planning
process.
Encourage the use of comprehensive planning, cumulative impact
thresholds and standards, inter-municipal agreements, and state
funded mediation, as pre-litigation steps.
The county should continue to bring concerned parties together
for educational outreach, comprehensive planning at the county level,
and technical assistance to municipalities.
Mining companies should link reclamation plans to community planning
and special assets (e.g., infrastructure, public access to water,
trails, fiber optics, and mixed-uses).
Mining companies should continue community education and open house
tours.
Finally, it is recommended that joint public-private ventures include
an aggregates industry museum, with an education, tourist, and conference
center on Route 16.
For more information contact:
Cattaraugus County Planning Board
c/o Economic Development, Planning & Tourism
303 Court Street
Little Valley, New York 14755
Phone 716-938-9111 EXT. 307
Cattaraugus
County Department of Planning
New York Dept. of Environmental
Conservation
Notes:
(1)Legislative Resolution, Act No. 250-99, Cattaraugus
County Legislature (April 14, 1999).
(2) This report was researched and written in the
Cattaraugus County Department of Economic Development. Planning,
and Tourism using the framework and vision presented in Pathway
to the Future - Planning for the 21st Century (Cattaraugus County
Planning Board, February 26, 1992).
|