Source: Policy Brief 8 (June 2001), University of Missouri-St. Louis Public Policy Research Center
Kent Robertson, Ph.D.,
St. Cloud State University - Minnesota
The purpose of this article is to present some of the key downtown
development trends and practices in the United States. These trends
are based on the author's extensive research, writings, and consulting
activities in the field of downtown development.
Trend #1: Emphasis on Multi-Functional Uses. Downtowns have
always housed a wide variety of functions. Where else can one find
shopping, services, professional offices, hotels, churches, housing,
entertainment, the arts, libraries, dining, government offices,
and more, all within walking distance of each other? Different functions
bring different types of people downtown at different times of the
day and week, thereby increasing the volume and distribution of
downtown activity levels.
Although downtown retailing can never hope to recapture the dominant
role of its heyday, recently there has been a notable increase in
several other functions. Cities large and small have encouraged
the development of more housing in and next to the downtown. Redevelopment
and new development of market rate, senior, and subsidized downtown
housing has been widespread. Tourism has also been widely utilized
as an economic development tool because of its potential to generate
income from outside of the community and to encourage a broader
mix of downtown shops, services, and restaurants.
Trend #2: Enhancement of Sense of Place. Most downtown development
efforts now recognize the value of possessing a strong sense of
place. A sense of place serves to create an inviting downtown that
encourages people to linger and is distinctive from other settings
that suffer from placelessness (i.e., shopping malls, big box retailers,
strip malls). A number of strategies have been implemented to enhance
downtown's sense of place. First, cities have made downtowns more
pedestrian-friendly by widening sidewalks, making street-crossings
easier and safer, and adding pedestrian amenities. Second, to take
advantage of the distinctive older architecture found downtown,
cities and downtown associations have established low-interest revolving
loan funds for façade improvements and have instituted design
guidelines or ordinances. Third, cities have added and enhanced
downtown open space. Open spaces are important to a downtown because
they encourage people to linger and provide a setting for community
gatherings. Finally, cities fortunate to possess a downtown waterfront
have worked to clear the waterfront of obsolete or undesirable uses,
increase public access, and provide clear pedestrian linkages to
the commercial core.
Trend #3: Development of a Community Vision. For many years
planning for downtown development was a top down endeavor directed
by government property owners, and businesses. The 1990[s ushered
in a more community-inclusive approach. Downtown visioning sessions
have become a popular starting point by identifying: 10 civic goals
and objectives for the downtown, 2) assets upon which the downtown
can build, 3) key problems, issues, and barriers that must be addressed,
and 4) opportunities that can be taken advantage of. The key to
successful visioning is to include a wide variety of downtown interests
- including small businesses, residents, employees, and institutions
- together with city government and other interested parties from
the community at large.
Trend #4: Use of Private/Public Partnerships. The partnering
of private and public interests and resources has become a dominant
feature of successful downtown development. An active and well-organized
downtown association can help downtown businesses and property owners
work together towards their mutual benefit, serve as a unified voice
representing downtown interests, and engage in marketing, promotions,
business recruitment, and event coordination.
Trend #5: Application of the Main Street Approach. A very
popular approach to downtown development, particularly in small
cities, is the Main Street Approach. This approach emphasizes the
balanced use of four critical elements; 1) organization of downtown
businesses and interests, 2) design that enhances visual qualities
and historic architecture, 3) promotion and marketing and 4) economic
restructuring and business recruitment.
Trend #6: Attention to Promotional Activities. The promotion
of downtown attractions, businesses, and events has become a major
dimension of downtown development today. Promotions are usually
spearheaded by the downtown organization. These organizations recognize
the necessity of reacquainting long-time residents and introducing
newer residents and visitors to the virtues of downtown. Staging
downtown events, such as festivals, parades, concerts, and craft
shows, can bring people downtown and expose them to what the downtown
has to offer.
Trend #7: Creation of New Suburban Downtowns. A recent trend
that provides extraordinary evidence of the value and importance
of downtowns is the development of new downtowns in suburbs that
heretofore have never possessed a traditional core district. In
suburban communities from Rockville, MD to Valencia, CA, new town
centers have been constructed that mirror many of the attributes
of traditional Main Streets, such as a high density pedestrian-friendly
setting that contains a variety of functions, including government
facilities in many cases. These suburbs are hopeful that their new
downtown will serve to provide a much needed identity and sense
of place for their community.
Conclusion
What lessons should policy makers take from this review? First,
cities of all sizes, including an increasing number of suburbs,
value downtown for its economic benefits, heritage, identity, and
sense of community/place. The entire community, not just the downtown,
benefits from a healthy downtown. Second, a strong commitment by
local government, in conjunction with a well-organized and active
private sector, is essential for successful downtown development.
Third, it is important for state government to be on board too.
Many states have established either a State main Street Office or
an Office of Downtown Development for the purpose of providing much
needed technical assistance and financial recourses to support local
downtown revitalization efforts.
Kent Robertson, Ph.D., is Professor and Director of Community
Development at St. Cloud State University (Minnesota). He
has published more than 20 professional articles on downtown development,
been a keynote speaker at several state and national conferences,
and assisted communities with their downtown development efforts
through facilitating visioning sessions (Marinette, Wisconsin; St.
Cloud, Minnesota), conducting workshops (Yonkers, New York; Wausau,
Wisconsin; Hartford, Wisconsin), and leading community forums (Jonesboro,
Arkansas; Anoka, Minnesota).
For more information and a copy of the full
article, contact:
Kent Robertson, Professor & Director
Community Development Program
Department of Community Studies
St. Cloud State University
St. Cloud MN 56301-4498
phone: 320-255-3184
fax: 320-654-5413
e-mail: kent@stcloudstate.edu
Center
for Community Economic Development
University of Wisconsin - Extension
New
York State Main Street Alliance
National
Main Street Center
|